Stuck on an issue?
Lightrun Answers was designed to reduce the constant googling that comes with debugging 3rd party libraries. It collects links to all the places you might be looking at while hunting down a tough bug.
And, if you’re still stuck at the end, we’re happy to hop on a call to see how we can help out.
Allowed Bucket Name Patterns
See original GitHub issueThe allowed pattern does not allow periods to exist in bucket names - even though periods are valid in S3 bucket creation. Perhaps this could be changed to [a-zA-Z][a-zA-Z0-9-.]* to allow periods.
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 6 years ago
- Comments:5 (3 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
Bucket naming rules - Amazon Simple Storage Service
Bucket names must be between 3 (min) and 63 (max) characters long. Bucket names can consist only of lowercase letters, numbers, dots (.),...
Read more >Regex for s3 bucket name - Stack Overflow
Bucket names must be between 3 (min) and 63 (max) characters long. · Bucket names can consist only of lowercase letters, numbers, dots...
Read more >S3 Bucket Creation Restrict to Specific Name Pattern
For naming buckets in Amazon S3, the following requirements apply: Bucket names must be three (minimum) to sixty-three (maximum) characters long ...
Read more >AWS S3 Bucket Name Validation Regex - Easy Dynamics
A Bucket's name can be between 6 and 63 characters long, containing lowercase characters, numbers, periods, and dashes · Each label must start...
Read more >Allowed Bucket Name Patterns · Issue #1 - GitHub
The allowed pattern does not allow periods to exist in bucket names - even though periods are valid in S3 bucket creation.
Read more >
Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start Free
Top Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
Would you test out this template, and verify that the new constraint works for your buckets? https://s3.amazonaws.com/solutions-test-reference/serverless-image-handler/latest/serverless-image-handler.template
Template updated. Closing ticket.