Add more information on return type of methods
See original GitHub issueFunctionDeclaration {
name: 'getNotificationSettingsForUser',
isExported: false,
type: 'Promise<{\n notificationRows: any;\n}>',
start: 5886,
end: 6006,
parameters:
[ ParameterDeclaration { name: 'this', type: 'ApiHandler', start: 5934, end: 5950 },
ParameterDeclaration { name: 'userID', type: 'any', start: 5952, end: 5963 } ],
variables: [] }
The type variable is all string, how can we improve analysis to get at its structure?
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 5 years ago
- Comments:6
Top Results From Across the Web
Returning a Value from a Method (The Java™ Tutorials ...
You declare a method's return type in its method declaration. Within the body of the method, you use the return statement to return...
Read more >Conventions regarding the return type for add() methods
If your add operation is immutable, it should return some value (this is the case of BigInteger ). Else you should return void...
Read more >Return type in Java | Example Program - Scientech Easy
Learn return type in java with example program, java return statement, how to get return value from method, print return value, class name...
Read more >Part 9 - Working with Methods (Return types) - YouTube
In this video we will be talking about Methods in C# and see how a method can return a value out from it....
Read more >Methods with Return Type in Java | Java Tutorial For Beginners
Please use the following link to install the Katalon Studio:https://katalon.com/sign-up?getr=krishnaRef Check Tubebuddy Features ...
Read more >
Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start Free
Top Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
Yep go for it
@jpike88 Would the pull request #101 be something that would be desirable in your typescript-parser-deluxe ? The most important commit was the first one which is called: ‘Added better js types’
What it does basically is add better type detection more so for JS then TS. If so I will work on merging it into it.