A concise type for a table?
See original GitHub issueLet’s say I have a DB with a users
table and the appropriate Mammoth defineTable
and defineDb
calls.
How can I get a concise type for that table, e.g. for use in a function signature:
function processUser(user: ???) { ... }
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 3 years ago
- Comments:10 (6 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
Designing Tables - Graphing - LabWrite
It should be concise and include the key elements shown in the table, for example, groups, classifications, variables, etc. It should never be...
Read more >Concise table names vs readability - Stack Overflow
So we are coming up with a lot of ProjectUserXXX table names. Some devs wan't to just get rid of the ProjectUser prefix,...
Read more >Figures and Charts - UNC Writing Center
Elements of a table include the Legend or Title, Column Titles, and the Table Body (quantitative or qualitative data). They may also include...
Read more >APA Tables and Figures - Purdue OWL
Like the title of the paper itself, each table must have a clear and concise title. Titles should be written in italicized title...
Read more >APA Format for Tables and Figures | Annotated Examples
A table concisely presents information (often numbers) in rows and columns. A figure is any other image or illustration you include in your...
Read more >
Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start Free
Top Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
A change to this just hit master. There may be some edge cases left to support but a straightforward
db.select(star()).from(..)
with different joins should just work.Since
star
is a common word, I think some people (like me) would use a qualified import, e.g.That’s not so bad.
Also, there’s the full
SELECT * FROM ...
and the table-specificSELECT t1.*, t2.f1 FROM ...
. Not sure if it’s worth addressing both of those.