Order's status ("pending") is not acceptable for finalization
See original GitHub issueI am currently trying to generate a certificate for my domain but keep running into the error as follows:
Fail to load resource from ‘https://acme-staging-v02.api.letsencrypt.org/acme/finalize/8478299/25683101’. urn:ietf:params:acme:error:orderNotReady: Order’s status (“pending”) is not acceptable for finalization
This is after checking that the dnsChallenge.Validate()
result is ChallengeStatus.Valid
. I don’t understand how the Validate()
method can return valid but yet I am running into an error where the order status is pending.
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 5 years ago
- Comments:6
Top Results From Across the Web
Order status pending, is not acceptable for finalization
The error means that the ACME server found a TXT DNS record for validatation, but its value does not much the expected value....
Read more >Unable to install a Let's Encrypt certificate: Order's status ...
Unable to install a Let's Encrypt certificate: Order's status (“pending”) is not acceptable for finalization or No order for ID - Support Cases...
Read more >Order's status ("pending") is not acceptable for finalization ...
Workaround for Plesk for Windows. First, we will connect to the Plesk server through RDP. Then we have to start the command prompt...
Read more >Order's status ("pending") is not acceptable for finalization ...
Once installed, go to Tools & Settings > SSL/TLS Certificates (under Security). Click Let's Encrypt. Make sure the Domain name and Email ...
Read more >Let's Encrypt returns "Order's status (\"valid\") is not ...
The first time I try to pull a cert for a domain name, it returns "Order's status (\"processing\") is not acceptable for finalization"...
Read more >Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start FreeTop Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
Top GitHub Comments
Okay that makes sense, thank you very much. I will update my code accordingly.
It would be two TXT records under the same
_acme-challenge.<domain>
label. Two authorizations, two DNS-01 challenges. See https://github.com/letsencrypt/boulder/issues/4094 for more background.