Call client setname on a connection to cluster - currently blocked
See original GitHub issueHi,
I would like to client setname
on connections to redis cluster using your library, but unfortunately they are in a ‘blocked’ list of commands, what prevents me from doing it.
Are you able to suggest if there’s any way to achieve it using your library?
Thanks in advance, Konrad
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 4 years ago
- Comments:14 (7 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
ioredis connection keeps resetting when connecting to local ...
I have a docker compose containerized client/server node app that is failing to create a stable connection to a redis cluster I have...
Read more >Lettuce Reference Guide
Blocking happens on command level and affects only the command completion part, meaning multiple clients using the synchronous API can invoke ...
Read more >Redis Commands — redis-py dev documentation
This method sets client name only for current connection. If you want to set a common name for all connections managed by this...
Read more >Redis client handling
When a new client connection is accepted the following operations are performed: The client socket is put in the non-blocking state since Redis...
Read more >Compass Connection Errors - MongoDB
It is possible that your MongoDB cluster or server has been shutdown or had its hostname has changed. Contact your database administrator for...
Read more >
Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start Free
Top Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
I dont know really. I would have to dig deeper into what the java lib is doing, but my guess is that i will just replicate whatever redis-py is doing and then just fanout it to all nodes. More then that i dont know now.
Yes i think that should be easily replicated so the next release could include that fix.