Lower results when evaluating released BEVDet checkpoint
See original GitHub issueHello, I have tried to evaluate released BEVDet checkpoint as-is on my setup, but I get
mAP: 0.2751
mATE: 0.7179
mASE: 0.2738
mAOE: 0.5512
mAVE: 0.8747
mAAE: 0.2205
NDS: 0.3737
Eval time: 107.4s
Per-class results:
Object Class AP ATE ASE AOE AVE AAE
car 0.441 0.631 0.167 0.131 1.037 0.254
truck 0.197 0.757 0.225 0.125 0.828 0.227
bus 0.283 0.680 0.185 0.139 1.895 0.350
trailer 0.132 1.053 0.224 0.463 0.547 0.068
construction_vehicle 0.066 0.795 0.484 1.174 0.095 0.358
pedestrian 0.301 0.788 0.305 1.320 0.848 0.412
motorcycle 0.235 0.704 0.262 0.612 1.437 0.090
bicycle 0.182 0.607 0.265 0.875 0.310 0.006
traffic_cone 0.445 0.616 0.333 nan nan nan
barrier 0.468 0.547 0.287 0.122 nan nan
which is lower than the expected 30.8/40.4 mAP/NDS.
I am using A6000 GPUs, torch 1.10.1, cudatoolkit 11.3. Do you know what might be the issue?
I find that I have the exact same numbers as #15 @BoLang615, but I believe I am using the latest version. I would appreciate any pointers for this.
Thank you!
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created a year ago
- Comments:11 (11 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
mit-han-lab/bevfusion - GitHub
(2022/6/3) We released the first version of BEVFusion (with pre-trained checkpoints and evaluation). (2022/5/26) BEVFusion is released on arXiv.
Read more >arXiv:2210.06778v2 [cs.CV] 31 Oct 2022
We evaluate our proposed method across two commonly used benchmark datasets, ... features across the camera and the LiDAR branches, result-.
Read more >Delving into the Devils of Bird's-eye-view Perception
The evaluation of object detection is of two types: 3D object detection ... can be classified into three categories [60] : (a) Low...
Read more >A Simple Baseline for Multi-Camera 3D Object Detection
3D object detection with surrounding cameras has been a promising direction for autonomous driving. In this paper, we present SimMOD, ...
Read more >How can I evaluate multiple checkpoints with the TF2 Object ...
As of 02.2022. The Validation process is supposed to run at the same time with the Training process so that whenever a new...
Read more >
Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start Free
Top Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
@Divadi nice job! thank you so much for your information!
@HuangJunJie2017 Whew… I think I found the issue; I had Pillow 9.2.0 installed, probably causing some of the operations in image transforms (loading.py) to be slightly different from your Pillow 8.4.0. As a consequence, your loaded images’ differences with mine looked like this:
After downgrading to Pillow 8.4.0, the difference is nil:

Updated results:
Thank you for your help!