'trainingJobName' failed to satisfy constraint
See original GitHub issueI get the following error with the latest version but not for sagify version 0.10
An error occurred (ValidationException) when calling the CreateTrainingJob operation: 1 validation error detected: Value 'XXXXXXXXXXXX.dkr.ecr.us-east-1.amazonaw-2018-07-31-16-42-36-397' at 'trainingJobName' failed to satisfy constraint: Member must satisfy regular expression pattern: ^[a-zA-Z0-9](-*[a-zA-Z0-9])*
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 5 years ago
- Comments:9 (9 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
Issue in a creating a job with a name containing underscore
Please fill out the form below. ... at 'trainingJobName' failed to satisfy constraint: Member must satisfy regular expression pattern: ...
Read more >Validation error ... Member must satisfy regular expression ...
I'm trying to stream rds through kinesis data stream but it is giving me this error: botocore ...
Read more >HyperParameterTrainingJobSum...
The reason that the training job failed. Type: String. Length Constraints: Maximum length of 1024. Required: No. FinalHyperParameterTuningJobObjectiveMetric.
Read more >Machine Learning with AWS Sagemaker - LinkedIn
instanceType' failed to satisfy constraint: Member must satisfy enum value set: [ml.p2.xlarge, ml.m5.4xlarge, ml.m4.16xlarge, ml.p3.16xlarge ...
Read more >Amazon SageMaker - Developer Guide
if status == 'Failed': message = sm.describe_training_job(TrainingJobName=training_job_name). ['FailureReason'] print('Training failed with the following ...
Read more >
Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start Free
Top Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
With #44 merged, @pm3310 can you try to see if the errors you were getting persist?
@andreas-grivas You should not need to use your workaround anymore, let me know if that’s not the case and I’ll get to it 😄
New version deployed https://pypi.org/project/sagify/ 😄 Version 0.12.1 is available via pypi