Cannot find IO for nrrd file
See original GitHub issueim trying to display an .nrrd
file in the viewer from S3.
i have a link for downloading the file.
when i download and copy the file to my project it load without any issues, how ever loading it directly from the s3 link throws an error from the piepline.worker that it cannot find IO for the file.
any idea or suggestions for the issue? (im trying to find a solution that will not require downloading the file to my server every time i want to display it)
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created a year ago
- Comments:14 (7 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
Cannot import nrrd - Support - 3D Slicer Community
Before analyzing with pyradiomics, I want to use a 3D slicer to read the nrrd file. But, error occurs during the process of...
Read more >Include nrrd reader in project - Development - Image.sc Forum
So I tried to include the sc.fiji.io stuff to my pom (that has … ... I cannot find File > Import > Nrrd...
Read more >Source code for ClearMap.IO.NRRD
Arguments --------- location : str The file nameof the nrrd source. ... if not line.startswith('NRRD'): raise NrrdError('Missing magic "NRRD" word.
Read more >[Rtk-users] Could not create IO object when using ... - Kitware
[Rtk-users] Could not create IO object when using rtkForwardProjections application with NRRD file.
Read more >Cannot open gzip-encoded nrrd files · Issue #397 - GitHub
A nrrd file with the header below throws an UnsupportedCompressionException Exception in thread "main" java.io.IOException: io.scif.img.
Read more >
Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start Free
Top Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
I kind of went a bit further, really hope I didn’t go overboard and that function is not public API 😃
Hi there 😃
So can we replace this parsing with something more robust like
that would take care of any query parameters and so on? (assuming
image
is an instance ofURL
)P.S. maybe even use
at(-1)
instead ofslice(-1)[0]
(depends on compatibility I guess)?