Stuck on an issue?
Lightrun Answers was designed to reduce the constant googling that comes with debugging 3rd party libraries. It collects links to all the places you might be looking at while hunting down a tough bug.
And, if you’re still stuck at the end, we’re happy to hop on a call to see how we can help out.
develop vs main-wip branch
See original GitHub issueI recently noticed that the icons in the main-wip branch have a completely different design than those in the develop branch. Any information on that? Will there be 2 icon-packs? Can people choose between them?
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 2 years ago
- Comments:9 (7 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
GitHub: What is a "wip" branch? - Stack Overflow
Conventionally, "wip" stands for "work in progress".
Read more >Work-In-Progress (WIP) commits: a git technique in Trunk ...
'master' branch. This technique helps us create checkpoints at some predetermined stopping points in your development flow.
Read more >Do not WIP | Findmypast Tech
I've been using Trunk-based development for some time now. ... Let's create a branch, and commit this changes as “WIP”.
Read more >Recommended git workflow for feature branches
This is a guide on how to effectively use git when working on a feature branch. It is designed to get out of...
Read more >Branching Strategies in Git - CSS-Tricks
One well-known branching strategy is called Git Flow. The main branch always reflects the current production state. There is a second long- ...
Read more >
Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start Free
Top Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
It looks like
main-wipincludes mainly line icons. Currentdeveloperbranch includes both line and filled icons, thus creating inconsistency. Would be so cool to choose from line and filled icon packs.I think the icons should have been just the stock app icons weather they are thin or filled, they shouldn’t be styled based on another design language.
The inconsistencies don’t mean that the icon pack is incomplete IMO