Unlocalizable strings
See original GitHub issueDescription
The following strings do not exist in translations/en.json
, so they’re not showing up in Crowdin:
- “Channels” menu’s label on the main screen
- “onchain” and “in channels” on the
Pay
screen - “or” on the
Connect
screen during the onboarding - Some error message that shows up when trying to unlock a remote node
Bonus:
- Shouldn’t the
open
status label next to each channel sayonline
instead? In contrast to theoffline
status.
Screenshots
Respectively:
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 4 years ago
- Comments:8 (8 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
Localization | Apple Developer Documentation
First, internationalize your code with APIs that automatically format and translate strings correctly for the language and region. Then add support for content ......
Read more >how to localize iOS apps with string examples
Localizable.strings stores application strings as key-value pairs for each language. Let's create this file for the base language first.
Read more >Where the &$!#% is Localizable.strings?!?
Localizable.strings files have long housed the mappings of our string identifiers (frequently the native language representation of our strings) ...
Read more >Localized Strings
A localized string can have different values depending on the language in which the project is being build. There are two categories of...
Read more >How to localize your iOS app
Localizing text you create in code ... Go to the File menu and choose New > File, then select Strings File from the...
Read more >
Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start Free
Top Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
Yes, please do @bolatovumar
@mrfelton ok, i tried out that rule and it found 26 errors. I’m thinking it’s worth it to create a separate issue for this and have a PR that enables this rule?