Explore API for child selecting
See original GitHub issueI have some code like so:
click(
testSelector('primitive-list-header') + ' '
+ testSelector('pointer')
);
Thoughts about how this could get better?
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 6 years ago
- Reactions:1
- Comments:7 (6 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
Use query parameters to customize responses - Microsoft Graph
Microsoft Graph provides optional query parameters that you can use to specify and control the amount of data returned in a response.
Read more >api - How do I filter and select inside a expanded collection on ...
When filtering/selecting within an expand, you need to use ; as the ... eq 0&$expand=children($select=id,folder,name,parentReference,cwebUrl ...
Read more >Take Your Child to Work to Play with APIs - Postman Blog
You and your favorite kids can join a special Postman livestream ... We'll also introduce some kid-friendly APIs you can explore together.
Read more >APIs for Beginners - How to use an API (Full Course / Tutorial)
Learn all about APIs (Application Programming Interfaces) in this full ... Unit 2 - Exploring APIs ⌨️ Video 1 - Exploring an API...
Read more >Selectors | jQuery API Documentation
For example, an element with id="foo.bar" , can use the selector $("#foo\\.bar") . ... Select all elements that have no children (including text...
Read more >Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start FreeTop Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
Top GitHub Comments
On my team, we started pulling test selectors up into a simple object at the top of test files: https://gist.github.com/caseywatts/46643c9c0825c5e8b1e2542b0a150659
It’s the sort of sugar that
testSelector
was going for, but more explicit. You can tell exactly what’s going on from within this single file.Just brainstorming, but what about something like this:
Which would be transformed at runtime to:
I’m open to other suggestions about the prefix symbol (
@
), but in general this seems like a concise API that could work.