[SUGGESTION] I wish to have a feature for handling LiteDb with Isolated Storage

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe. I wish to store some information where I believe IsolatedStorage is the best candidate. The dotnet API does not provide a full path for the IsolatedStorage file where we can pass it to LiteDb to store the database (with reflection its possible, however it is a hack and not a perfect solution I believe).

Describe the solution you’d like I would like a constructor which accepts IsolatedStorageFile instance and with the other options like Password and other connection string options we can pass.

Describe alternatives you’ve considered I tried it with the hack and was not satisfied with the flow of the code, for just getting a field, I had to use reflection, and it is internal which may get renamed anytime.

Additional context I would be happy if there is another constructor overload with the options mentioned above.

[pankaj-nikam]

Agree with you @quicksln. Its good to make an extension method.

[quicksln]

@lbnascimento good point with adding log file stream, @pankaj-nikam hope you find this useful.

Defiantly it’s good candidate for extension method inside individual project 😃

Regards Piotr