Lightrun Answers was designed to reduce the constant googling that comes with debugging 3rd party libraries. It collects links to all the places you might be looking at while hunting down a tough bug.
And, if you’re still stuck at the end, we’re happy to hop on a call to see how we can help out.
ENH: deadtime support for TransferFunction
See original GitHub issueBackground
It would be quite useful to have real (e^(- deadtime * s)) deadtime in transfer functions. When multiple operations are performed on them, (decoupling methods for mimo systems, multiloop control tunning strategies like BLT, etc.), pade’s approximation doesn’t quite cut it (the orders grow too much and the computation comes out imprecise).
Proposal
I would like to try adding this feature for the tf and most of it’s methods. Of course, keeping retro-compatibility.
I wonder if prior approaches have been done in order to address this problem, and if there is a big roadblock in sight. That would be nice to know.
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 2 years ago
- Reactions:2
- Comments:7 (5 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
Top Related Medium Post
Top Related StackOverflow Question
Troubleshoot Live Code
Top Related Reddit Thread
Top Related Hackernoon Post
Top Related Tweet
Top Related Dev.to Post
Top Related Hashnode Post
The JuliaControl toolbox supports a DelayLtiSystem type (which we would probably call
DelayLTI) that you might look at for some ideas.Hi Sawyer! Great then, I’ll start working on it to see what I can do.
Thanks for the tips! Those ideas sound great 😃