Breaking changes plan for v2
See original GitHub issueThere is no ETA for v2
yet, as there are not much important changes were made or planned to be, but at least we can track the things which can be improved or changed:
- Make
override: true
input by default - Make
profile: minimal
input by default - Replace
target
input withtargets
, which will allow passing multiple targets to install -
Support fornot a breaking change, yay!rust-toolchain
file (#21) (not sure yet if breaking change)
In case you have an idea, feel free to add it in here as an issue comment.
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 4 years ago
- Reactions:3
- Comments:8 (1 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
please highlight breaking changes when migrating from v2 to ...
Actually, I'd like to highlight a breaking change. When using devtools , the set function which saves the partial object to the state...
Read more >What Are Breaking Changes and How Do You Avoid Them?
What are breaking changes? And how can we avoid them? Here are best practices to avoid and mitigate breaking changes for your API...
Read more >A Note On Breaking Changes In The Plugin SDK
We're planning to, on Wednesday, move our development efforts for the upcoming v2.0.0 of the SDK to the master branch of our repo,...
Read more >Recharts v2: breaking changes from v1.8x - Stack Overflow
I would like to upgrade that to v2.x.x, but I haven't found any migration guide/breaking changes list anywhere.
Read more >Updates and breaking changes - Azure - Microsoft Learn
This security change helps to bring Azure AD in line with the OAuth specification and will be enforced on both the v1 and...
Read more >Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start FreeTop Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
Top GitHub Comments
Couldn’t a
targets
input be provided, explicitly overridingtargef
? That would be back-compatible. Alternatively, it could be additive.I just want to say that I hugely support this!