Error from graph_handler
See original GitHub issueThanks for the great work and for sharing the codes.
I am trying to reproduce your single model results. Following the steps you have described, I tried:
python -m basic.cli --mode train --noload --len_opt --cluster
Everything worked fine till 4% of training, then I got the following error from graph_handler
:
File "basic/main.py", line 117, in _train
graph_handler.add_summaries(e_train.summaries, global_step)
AttributeError: 'int' object has no attribute 'summaries'
It looks like it is from TF, not sure, any ideas how I can resolve this?
Thanks! Hamid
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 7 years ago
- Comments:12
Top Results From Across the Web
Handling operation errors - Apollo GraphQL Docs
Apollo Client can encounter a variety of errors when executing operations on your GraphQL server. Apollo Client helps you handle these errors according...
Read more >Microsoft Graph error responses and resource types
Learn about errors that can be returned in Microsoft Graph responses. Errors are returned using standard HTTP status codes and a JSON error...
Read more >How to use the Microsoft Graph SDK Chaos Handler to ...
The concept behind the Chaos Handler is to intercept outbound requests being made from the SDK and rather than actually make those calls...
Read more >Handle Errors - Graph API - Meta for Developers
The Handle Errors for Graph API Requests guide describes the errors and possible reasoning for requests that receive an error.
Read more >Default error handler · Issue #9 · oliyh/re-graph - GitHub
If a query has an error the message from the server will be of type "data" which contains errors (see this issue). All...
Read more >Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start FreeTop Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
Top GitHub Comments
Hi Hamid,
I confirm that I can reproduce your results 74.7% F1 (with their own unofficial evaluation) using the default settings. (Earlier, I was preprocessing the data using Python 2 which might have cause some problems).
Thanks! -Thang
Resolved!