Storage Tuple concat
See original GitHub issuehttps://github.com/angr/angr/blob/master/angr/storage/file.py#L191
kwargs['extra_constraints'] = kwargs.get('extra_constraints', ()) + (self._size == size,)
should be:
kwargs['extra_constraints'] = kwargs.get('extra_constraints', []) + [self._size == size]
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 5 years ago
- Comments:9 (4 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
Python | Ways to concatenate tuples - GeeksforGeeks
Let's discuss certain ways in which this task can be performed. Method #1 : Using + operator This is the most Pythonic and...
Read more >Concatenating Tuple - python - Stack Overflow
It's quite obvious why, I am trying to concatenate an integer with a tuple. But tuples don't have the same functions as lists...
Read more >Understanding Tuples in Python 3 - DigitalOcean
Operators can be used to concatenate or multiply tuples. Concatenation is done with the + operator, and multiplication is done with the * ......
Read more >Ways to concatenate tuples in Python - Tutorialspoint
When it is required to concatenate multiple tuples, the '+' operator can be used. A tuple is an immutable data type.
Read more >How to Concatenate two Python tuples - YouTube
In this video, we will see how to Concatenate two Python Tuples. Tuple is a sequence in Python, a collection of objects. Python...
Read more >Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start FreeTop Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
Top GitHub Comments
I pushed two things that make your script work. The first is using
min
to evaluate the filesize instead ofeval
.The second is a quick hack to make working with unlinked files more convenient. As an optimization, we don’t actually deepcopy the unlinked files since nobody can ever mutate them anymore, but it does mean that they’re stuck with the state, and thus the constraints, from when they’re unlinked. This is easily fixed by just reassociating them with the state you want to solve against, but this is unintuitive. Now, whenever you access
.unlinks
, it’ll automatically associate the files with the current state. This will cause problems if you ever pull a reference to a file out of the unlinks list and store it elsewhere, and then try to access a different state’s unlinks containing the same file, but that seems relatively uncommon.Thank you for looking into this!