'up to now' feature in DatePicker/MonthPicker/TimerPicker
See original GitHub issueWhat problem does this feature solve?
‘up to now’ doesn’t mean today. eg: I want users to choose the period of their career experience, if they are still on the job in current company, the period should end with ‘up to now’ not ‘today’
What does the proposed API look like?
showUpToNow
just like showToday
, and the value can be empty string or something special, and in the input area should show ‘up to now’ instead of a specific time
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 6 years ago
- Comments:9 (5 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
jQuery UI DatePicker to show month year only - Stack Overflow
I'm trying to use this solution, but using getDate on a datepicker returns only today. What's up? – supertopi. Jan 30, 2012 at...
Read more >Datepicker - jQuery UI
The datepicker is tied to a standard form input field. Focus on the input (click, or use the tab key) to open an...
Read more >Date Range Picker — JavaScript Date & Time Picker Library
Produces: You can customize Date Range Picker with options, and get notified when the user chooses new dates by providing a callback function....
Read more >Date pickers – Material Design 3
Date pickers can display past, present, or future dates relevant to a task; Clearly indicate important dates, such as current and selected days ......
Read more >Options — bootstrap-datepicker documentation - Read the Docs
All options that take a “Date” can handle a Date object; a String formatted according to the given format ; or a timedelta...
Read more >
Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start Free
Top Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
Indeed it’s a little tricky here, maybe I will do as LinkedIn did.
I think it could be resolved with #6122