Self hosted vercel instance gives maxDuration warning
See original GitHub issueDescribe the bug
When I try to deploy the master branch on my self-hosted vercel instance (i.e. https://github.com/anuraghazra/github-readme-stats#deploy-on-your-own-vercel-instance) I get the following error:
The value for maxDuration must be between 1 second and 10 seconds, in order to increase this limit upgrade your plan: https://vercel.com/pricing
I did some debugging and this error has been present since 81b6593.
Expected behaviour
This error should not be present.
TODO
- We should document why this is happening.
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 2 years ago
- Comments:12 (6 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
Errors – Vercel Docs
A list of errors provided by Vercel CLI or the REST API, with details on how they occur and how to resolve them....
Read more >Serverless Functions – Vercel Docs
Vercel Serverless Functions enable running code on-demand without needing to manage your own infrastructure, provision servers, or upgrade hardware.
Read more >Limits – Vercel Docs
The maximum execution timeout is 10 seconds when deployed on a Personal Account (Hobby plan). For Teams, the execution timeout is 60 seconds...
Read more >Can I use Vercel to deploy to a private cloud?
Prototyping on Vercel Once a prototype is approved, the production build can be deployed to your cloud or on-premises hosting. This is a...
Read more >Project Config with vercel.json
In the example above, visiting /about locally will give you a 404 with vercel dev ... maxDuration (optional): An integer defining how long...
Read more >Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start FreeTop Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
Top GitHub Comments
@anuraghazra I think that is a good idea. I reopened the issue. Can you like the related issues?
@anuraghazra Thanks for your pull request! I think it is clear now.