Advertised broker address
See original GitHub issueExpected behavior
Connecting through the discovery to the broker in the cluster setup should redirect to the public address of the broker. Preferably there should be an option to set an advertised hostname
, this should come together with an option to set a bind host
for the broker (however, this might not be necessary).
Actual behavior
Broker advertises the hostname
as the address for the client to connect to. On EC2, it results in the client trying to connect to something like ip-xx-xxx-xxx-xxx
which is not resolvable from outside of the same region. The error I see on my local machine while trying to publish messages to Pulsar is the following:
2016-09-19 17:45:38,592 - ERROR - [main:CmdProduce@186] - java.net.UnknownHostException: ip-10-239-182-4: unknown error
com.yahoo.pulsar.client.api.PulsarClientException: java.net.UnknownHostException: ip-10-239-182-4: unknown error
at com.yahoo.pulsar.client.impl.HttpClient$1.onThrowable(HttpClient.java:139)
at com.ning.http.client.providers.netty.future.NettyResponseFuture.abort(NettyResponseFuture.java:238)
at com.ning.http.client.providers.netty.request.NettyRequestSender.abort(NettyRequestSender.java:422)
at com.ning.http.client.providers.netty.request.NettyRequestSender.sendRequestWithNewChannel(NettyRequestSender.java:290)
at com.ning.http.client.providers.netty.request.NettyRequestSender.sendRequestWithCertainForceConnect(NettyRequestSender.java:142)
at com.ning.http.client.providers.netty.request.NettyRequestSender.sendRequest(NettyRequestSender.java:117)
at com.ning.http.client.providers.netty.request.NettyRequestSender.sendNextRequest(NettyRequestSender.java:493)
at com.ning.http.client.providers.netty.handler.Protocol.exitAfterHandlingRedirect(Protocol.java:189)
at com.ning.http.client.providers.netty.handler.HttpProtocol.handleHttpResponse(HttpProtocol.java:427)
at com.ning.http.client.providers.netty.handler.HttpProtocol.handle(HttpProtocol.java:470)
at com.ning.http.client.providers.netty.handler.Processor.messageReceived(Processor.java:88)
at org.jboss.netty.channel.SimpleChannelUpstreamHandler.handleUpstream(SimpleChannelUpstreamHandler.java:70)
at org.jboss.netty.channel.DefaultChannelPipeline.sendUpstream(DefaultChannelPipeline.java:564)
at org.jboss.netty.channel.DefaultChannelPipeline$DefaultChannelHandlerContext.sendUpstream(DefaultChannelPipeline.java:791)
at org.jboss.netty.handler.stream.ChunkedWriteHandler.handleUpstream(ChunkedWriteHandler.java:142)
at org.jboss.netty.channel.DefaultChannelPipeline.sendUpstream(DefaultChannelPipeline.java:564)
at org.jboss.netty.channel.DefaultChannelPipeline$DefaultChannelHandlerContext.sendUpstream(DefaultChannelPipeline.java:791)
at org.jboss.netty.handler.codec.http.HttpContentDecoder.messageReceived(HttpContentDecoder.java:108)
at org.jboss.netty.channel.SimpleChannelUpstreamHandler.handleUpstream(SimpleChannelUpstreamHandler.java:70)
at org.jboss.netty.channel.DefaultChannelPipeline.sendUpstream(DefaultChannelPipeline.java:564)
at org.jboss.netty.channel.DefaultChannelPipeline$DefaultChannelHandlerContext.sendUpstream(DefaultChannelPipeline.java:791)
at org.jboss.netty.channel.Channels.fireMessageReceived(Channels.java:296)
at org.jboss.netty.handler.codec.frame.FrameDecoder.unfoldAndFireMessageReceived(FrameDecoder.java:459)
at org.jboss.netty.handler.codec.replay.ReplayingDecoder.callDecode(ReplayingDecoder.java:536)
at org.jboss.netty.handler.codec.replay.ReplayingDecoder.messageReceived(ReplayingDecoder.java:435)
at org.jboss.netty.channel.SimpleChannelUpstreamHandler.handleUpstream(SimpleChannelUpstreamHandler.java:70)
at org.jboss.netty.handler.codec.http.HttpClientCodec.handleUpstream(HttpClientCodec.java:92)
at org.jboss.netty.channel.DefaultChannelPipeline.sendUpstream(DefaultChannelPipeline.java:564)
at org.jboss.netty.channel.DefaultChannelPipeline.sendUpstream(DefaultChannelPipeline.java:559)
at org.jboss.netty.channel.Channels.fireMessageReceived(Channels.java:268)
at org.jboss.netty.channel.Channels.fireMessageReceived(Channels.java:255)
at org.jboss.netty.channel.socket.nio.NioWorker.read(NioWorker.java:88)
at org.jboss.netty.channel.socket.nio.AbstractNioWorker.process(AbstractNioWorker.java:108)
at org.jboss.netty.channel.socket.nio.AbstractNioSelector.run(AbstractNioSelector.java:337)
at org.jboss.netty.channel.socket.nio.AbstractNioWorker.run(AbstractNioWorker.java:89)
at org.jboss.netty.channel.socket.nio.NioWorker.run(NioWorker.java:178)
at org.jboss.netty.util.ThreadRenamingRunnable.run(ThreadRenamingRunnable.java:108)
at org.jboss.netty.util.internal.DeadLockProofWorker$1.run(DeadLockProofWorker.java:42)
at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1142)
at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:617)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745)
Caused by: java.net.UnknownHostException: ip-10-239-182-4: unknown error
at java.net.Inet6AddressImpl.lookupAllHostAddr(Native Method)
at java.net.InetAddress$2.lookupAllHostAddr(InetAddress.java:928)
at java.net.InetAddress.getAddressesFromNameService(InetAddress.java:1323)
at java.net.InetAddress.getAllByName0(InetAddress.java:1276)
at java.net.InetAddress.getAllByName(InetAddress.java:1192)
at java.net.InetAddress.getAllByName(InetAddress.java:1126)
at java.net.InetAddress.getByName(InetAddress.java:1076)
at com.ning.http.client.NameResolver$JdkNameResolver.resolve(NameResolver.java:28)
at com.ning.http.client.providers.netty.request.NettyRequestSender.remoteAddress(NettyRequestSender.java:358)
at com.ning.http.client.providers.netty.request.NettyRequestSender.connect(NettyRequestSender.java:369)
at com.ning.http.client.providers.netty.request.NettyRequestSender.sendRequestWithNewChannel(NettyRequestSender.java:283)
... 37 more
I could set the hostname on the machine to a public IP address / public hostname but it is an ugly workaround. I do not have any DNS other than EC2 defaults available right now.
Steps to reproduce
Launch the cluster setup in EC2 (without any DNS other than EC2 defaults) and try producing messages.
System configuration
Pulsar version: 1.14
If the suggestions sound okay, I can prepare a PR.
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 7 years ago
- Reactions:1
- Comments:6 (6 by maintainers)
Top GitHub Comments
Yes, having both gives the most flexibility, and please go ahead in removing
bindOnLocalhost
.@merlimat Please see attached PR. I went for
brokerAddress
andadvertisedAddress
as these settings relate tobroker.conf
file.