[SIP-1] Split the Table visualization into two visualizations
See original GitHub issueSIP-1 Split the Table visualization into two visualizations
Motivation
The current Table
visualization is confusing as it shows 2 control sections, GROUP BY
and NOT GROUPED BY
that are mutually exclusive. It’s not clear that they are, and if both sections are used Superset will raise and error suggesting to clear some of the controls
Proposed Change
Split the current table
visualization into 2 entry points: Table - Samples
and Table - Aggregated
. The GROUP BY
and NOT GROUPED BY
control sections will become a Query
section in respective visualizations.
New or Changed Public Interfaces
The main change to users is the 2 entries points, essentially a new visualization in the visualizations menu.
Migration Plan and Compatibility
- a database migration re-assigning
NOT GROUPED BY
visualizations to the new type - minor code changes introducing the new visualization
Rejected Alternatives
N/A
@betodealmeida what do you think of this template for SIPs? Took it from here: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/Kafka+Improvement+Proposals
test edit
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 5 years ago
- Reactions:1
- Comments:9 (6 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
[SIP-1] Split the Table visualization into two visualizations #5528
Split the current table visualization into 2 entry points: Table - Samples and Table - Aggregated . The GROUP BY and NOT GROUPED...
Read more >Using a table visual, splitting the results into 2 columns
Hello,. I have a table with a single column, but I want the results to be split among two columns instead.
Read more >How to use SMALL MULTIPLES to SPLIT VISUALS and get an ...
Get Demo Files herehttps://ko-fi.com/s/fc58fef0a5In this video were going to go through how you can create small multiples in order to ...
Read more >Visualizations with two tables - Qlik Community - 1878685
The visualization I want to do is very simple: I want to create a treemap chart of all the different zones and how...
Read more >The Expanded Data in Analysis Flyout
If you click on a column in the Data in analysis flyout, the flyout will expand and either show you recommendations, or, details...
Read more >Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start FreeTop Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
Top GitHub Comments
Didn’t know I accidentally fixed SIP No. 1!
@mistercrunch we agree that the current table UX is confusing, however we aren’t sure if this is really the long-term solution. The atomic vs. non-atomic issue is systemic to all visualization types, not just to the table. i.e., if you extrapolate this logic, we would have to have two time series charts, two bar charts, etc., to support both atomic tables and aggregated data sources.
It seems like a better solution would be to extend ad-hoc metrics to understand the difference between atomic vs non-atomic, i.e., a metric could be an aggregation on a non-atomic column or merely the value of an atomic column.