[simple-romp] Semantic versioning & releasesSee original GitHub issue
It seems, that the version of
simple-romp might be wrong:
It should be:
How do you think about this?
I would also love to have an version-tag (
simple-romp-v0.3.1 ?) to be able to create
conda packages easierly:
Of course i would also publish it for you, if it’s okay.
- Created a year ago
- Comments:10 (10 by maintainers)
Top GitHub Comments
Thanks, I see you point.
@vivi90 Thanks a lot, Vivien! I am trying to make the version number right following your guidance.
I just rectify the release version, https://github.com/Arthur151/ROMP/releases
I will make the pip package version consistent with the release version.
But I might take a different way, like regarding this repo as a series works. V0.x CenterHMR -> V1.x ROMP -> V2.x simple_romp (ROMP+BEV) -> … This means the version number is for this repo, instead of the version of ROMP. This is also the reason why the version number of simple_romp pip is independent. But you are right, we should make them consistent. Of course, this won’t stop. I will write the history about this repo in a separate page.
Any comments are welcome~