Capture socket.io acknowledgement response
See original GitHub issueIt would be awesome if we could also capture socket.io acknowledgement response instead of waiting for a response on a channel.
We could use a boolean option like captureAck
.
I’d be happy to contribute if you’re OK with that.
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 5 years ago
- Comments:5 (2 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
Emitting events
Events are great, but in some cases you may want a more classic request-response API. In Socket.IO, this feature is named acknowledgements.
Read more >Acknowledgment for socket.io custom event
I have seen a mechanism where the receiver would send another custom event as an acknowledgement, but this would add thousands of transports...
Read more >Testing Socket.IO | Artillery
IO testing functionality in Artillery provided by the built-in Socket. ... IO acknowledgement response or validate a response, you can also use the ......
Read more >Using WebSocket requests
Using the dropdown list in the request tab, select either Raw for a raw WebSocket request, or Socket.IO for a Socket.IO request. Enter...
Read more >Node JS - Socket.IO - Acknowledging Events - YouTube
In this video we will be creating a function that will generate our messages as objects. We will also be looking at acknowledgements...
Read more >Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start FreeTop Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
Top GitHub Comments
Docs have been updated: https://artillery.io/docs/socketio-reference/#acknowledgements-response-validation Thanks @HosseinAgha!
It’s gone 😦 I’m still in the quest to listen an emit back from server during testing