Improved partials editing support
See original GitHub issueWhen you’re working on a large documentation project where many document contents are assembled using the include macro, editing of the included bits can be cumbersome.
When editing the page containing the include you have all the necessary context (e.g., attribute values) available, but all you see in the editor is the include macro.
When editing the included bit (e.g. an Antora partial) you see the content of the included bit, but you’re missing the context and as a consequence may end up having unresolved attributes.
Neither option is ideal.
Being able to edit the partial content in place where it’s included or conversely being able to specify the context when editing the partial directly would make the editing workflow easier I think.
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 3 years ago
- Comments:10 (10 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
Technical Tips for Improved Retention and Stabilization of a ...
Implant support of a unilateral RPD can provide additional stability and retention and may prevent such complications as aspiration or ...
Read more >Improving Esthetics of Removable Partial Dentures Using ...
A removable partial denture replacing anterior missing teeth can improve esthetics and hence the patient's quality of life.
Read more >Flexible Partial Dentures & Best Alternatives
Compared with metal partials, flexible partials provide greater comfort and offer improved esthetics without metal clasps – or any metal at ...
Read more >Choose the right patients for flexible removable partial dentures
Flexible partial denture materials are an excellent option for many partially edentulous patients. However, what are the benefits of ...
Read more >Implant Supported Removable Partial Denture: The Why and ...
The benefits of dental implants in improving the quality of life for these patients have been well documented. The replacement of missing teeth ......
Read more >
Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start Free
Top Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found

Hi @pepijnve - I’ve revisited this issue after some time. Reading it again, I consider “placing a dummy image in the shared component” would provide the best preview in the scenario you describe above: A dummy could be just the right size to show how the content should look like.
I would prefer to put a dummy image (to show a nice preview) instead of disabling the error message in the editor for partials and showing a broken image in the preview.
As the dummy image is something that is already available, I close this issue as “nothing more to do”.
If you find other corner issues with partials, please let me know, and I’ll re-open the issue.
There is always more than one way to do things. I outline some that come to my mind.
For a future version of the plugin: The automatic checks shouldn’t show false positives. I could disable the “AsciiDocLinkResolve” inspection on all partials. What do you think?
To get rid of the squiggly line with the current version of the plugin: