Run mode on client-side
See original GitHub issueRun mode has some limitations (the big one is unsafe
), is it feasible to send back compiled binaries to browser and run as WebAssembly and relax those limitations? (this might be related to https://github.com/ashmind/SharpLab/issues/256)
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 5 years ago
- Reactions:3
- Comments:9 (6 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
Get runmodes value in client-side JS
To manage/configure run mode specific value, you should use run mode osgi configuration and read key value using model.and store either in HTML...
Read more >What do client side and server side mean?
Client -side refers solely to the location where processes run, while frontend refers to the kinds of processes that run client-side.
Read more >Nuxt - can i run client side code from a middleware in ...
First You need to run your middleware code only on the client side. ... I guess you can check the route and then...
Read more >The difference between Client mode and Server mode
Client side and server side are terms that both indicate how and where code runs.
Read more >Allow middleware to run client-side only in SSR mode #7474
I would suggest the feature of using middleware.client.js and middleware.server.js vs this flag so it matches the same feature of plugins. This ...
Read more >Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start FreeTop Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
Top GitHub Comments
Hmm, wait, I might be able to run normal .NET IL as you said. I’ll investigate.
I don’t see why not (if Azure builds have proper CORS headers). I think I still need server part for some of the Run features, but maybe not even that.
I’ll deprioritize this ticket and look into mirrorsharp one instead — no reason to design a way to download an assembly if the assembly will be built on local later on.