Missing settings metadata of a review in version 1.0
See original GitHub issueWhen creating a new project in version 1.0, the settings_metadata.json
in the reviews
folder has empty items model_param
, query_param
, feature_param
, and balance_param
, and items stop_if
, n_prior_included
, n_prior_excluded
, abstract_only
, as_data
are missing. Besides, mode
is always minimal
.
Instead, if you import and upgrade an old project, the items mentioned above have their values, and mode
is base
.
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created a year ago
- Comments:5 (5 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
EmailAdministrationSettings | Metadata API Developer Guide
Field Name Field Type Description
enableInternationalEmailAddresses boolean
enableRestrictTlsToDomains boolean
enableSendThroughGmailPref boolean Deprecated.
Read more >Error when trying to retrieve CustomObjectTranslation ...
Error when trying to retrieve CustomObjectTranslation metadata: "Metadata API request failed: Component conversion failed: Unexpected child metadata .
Read more >Unable to add new version for my a… | Apple Developer Forums
I just need to update the description of my app, which require uploading a new version. But I can't see an option to...
Read more >Metadata API Developer Guide
ISV partners can request Metadata API access to Professional Edition orgs for apps that have passed AppExchange Security Review.
Read more >Not able to retrieve Settings through Metadata API
You are missing apiVersion field in the soap request. I believe that field auto-populated by workbench. If you don't specify, ...
Read more >Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start FreeTop Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
Top GitHub Comments
Output for a simulation:
The items on top are command line arguments (except from
abstract_only
). They should only be available for simulation projects. I will test this asap.