Add the Planck18 (full mission) cosmological parameters

It looks like no one got around to adding the 2018 Planck mission final results to cosmology. So those should probably be added!

(Ideally for 3.1, although that would require CoCo approval since it’s post feature-freeze)

[aconley]

I would feel comfortable adding it as an option, but I would probably hold off on making it the default.

Can you imagine what reviewing one of these papers must be like?

On Thu, Nov 1, 2018 at 1:46 PM Erik Tollerud [e-mail] wrote:

Ah, makes sense @aconley https://github.com/aconley. Given the slightly awkward timing with the astropy release, do you think we should wait on this for v3.2 then, or put what’s in the arXiv papers in now and live dangerously in case something changes in the accepted paper?

— You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/astropy/astropy/issues/8006#issuecomment-435163248, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AB62hiRJx2Xm3QvcHklwQLpTVFUFXHp2ks5uq0-hgaJpZM4X9gka .

[aconley]

Doesn’t look like it, unfortunately. So, yes, we should probably move milestones.

On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 2:45 PM Brigitta Sipocz [e-mail] wrote:

@eteq https://github.com/eteq @aconley https://github.com/aconley - do you know whether the paper is accepted yet? If not I suggest to move the issue to the next milestone (with the note that we may need to change it become default in the next release, it being an LTS one).

— You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/astropy/astropy/issues/8006#issuecomment-482306958, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AB62hsIACgmmEHHt7psrQa9AgEPJRwRFks5vf57ZgaJpZM4X9gka .