Have default `repr` for [Q]Table show column classes
See original GitHub issueIn #6098, @taldcroft suggested (https://github.com/astropy/astropy/issues/6098#issuecomment-302536830) that it might be useful to have the default repr for tables show the classes of any mixin columns.
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 6 years ago
- Comments:6 (5 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
AttributeError when setting QTable column unit #6098 - GitHub
I have thought about having the default Table repr show the class of mixin columns. That might help things out. E.g..
Read more >python - How can we get the default behavior of __repr__()?
You can use object.__repr__(obj) . This works because the default repr behavior is defined in object.__repr__ .
Read more >QTableView Class | Qt Widgets 6.4.1
The QTableView class provides a default model/view implementation of a table view. More. ... This slot is called whenever columns are added or...
Read more >Display tables in PyQt5, QTableView with conditional ...
Create customized table views with conditional formatting, numpy and pandas data sources. In the previous chapter we covered an introduction ...
Read more >Qt 4.8: QTableView Class Reference
The QTableView class provides a default model/view implementation of a table view. More. ... This slot is called whenever columns are added or...
Read more >
Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start Free
Top Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found

@yashkmr99 - I actually agree with @mhvk that this was probably mislabeled. I suspect the final code change won’t be that big, but I wrote most of the code and I’m not immediately sure what has to be done. Can I suggest you head on over to #8522? That will be relatively straightforward!
Hi, I’d like to work on this if its not taken. I might need help though.