[Feature Request] Option to generate a map file even for vendor-bundle
See original GitHub issueI’m submitting a feature request
- Library Version: 0.20.0
Please tell us about your environment:
-
Operating System: OSX 10.11.6
-
Node Version: 6.4.0
-
NPM Version: 3.10.8
-
Browser: all
-
Language: all
Current behavior:
Now I have the option to turn on/off the generation of source maps for the app-bundle
, but I cannot find a way to have source maps generated for the vendor-bundle
Expected/desired behavior:
- What is the expected behavior?
Have a configuration option to generate the source maps for the
vendor-bundle
- What is the motivation / use case for changing the behavior? Sometimes you are in the following conditions:
- There’s a bug or an undocumented behavior in library code, and you need to step into the code to quickly find what’s happening in the browser
- You wrapped some common components in npm packages, and you published in a private repo. You want this common components in the
vendor-bundle
as they are not strictly app code. But you’d like to be able to debug them in the browser as well, even if they have tons of unit tests…
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 7 years ago
- Reactions:10
- Comments:7 (6 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
Option to exclude certain bundles from source map generation
I have tested excluding source map generation for the vendor bundle by adding an excludes: ['vendor'] to the SourceMapDevToolPlugin and this ...
Read more >Get the most out of the linker map file - Interrupt
In this article, I want to highlight how simple linker map files are and how much they can teach you about the program...
Read more >Bazel and map files? - Google Groups
I'm building an arm-gcc toolchain and trying to figure out how to get Bazel to generate map files that end up in bazel-bin...
Read more >What are the .map files used for in angular-cli and can ng ...
.map files are used for debugging your application. It is not related with angular-cli and is feature of typescript compiler, you may set\unset...
Read more >Selecting map files for map visualizations - IBM
Overlay map templates require two maps: a primary map file and a reference map file. The reference map is drawn first so that...
Read more >
Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start Free
Top Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
Our corporate project is deploying all our common “code” as a library that is used in our applications. This has been a critical issue for us. My assumption was there was just some switch we had to flick to get it to work, but it would appear to be a deeper issue. We do have our app code source mapping, but that is only usually about 5-10% of the total app (since most is encapsulated in common library code published to our internal repos) @zhhz would be most interested.
I should mention, that our need is primarily not for the vendor-bundle but for another bundle (which is our library) but from the inclusion perspective it would be the same as vendor… ie. the code is not present directly, but the modules in node_modules do have the source maps.
That’s good if you include minified files with source maps. But if like me you rely on the build process to minify your files, you’re still stuck. And I don’t see any improvements on this in #624. Should this issue be re-opened?