Add collection adapter for the Engine
See original GitHub issueCurrently in order to modify “Engine” builders, you need to pass a customized engine to the Fixture
constructor. That approach works, however is pretty inconvenient.
Instead, I suggest to add a collection adapter like Customizations
to make the replacement of default builders.
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 5 years ago
- Reactions:1
- Comments:5 (2 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
ESTES 302317 Standard to D Engine Adapter ESTT2317
Adapts D engine mounts to hold a standard engine. Two simple steps transform a standard engine into a D size. Insert a standard...
Read more >Engine Adapter Functions - Win32 apps
An engine adapter generates biometric templates from captured samples, matches samples to existing templates, and indexes templates.
Read more >HTTP Adapter Configuration - Basic
HTTP Adapter Configuration - Basic · Click Add to add a new engine to the configured adapter. · Click Copy to copy an...
Read more >set- engine adapter polini - Simplify PPG GmbH
you want to mount your vittorazi engine in the simplify ppg paramotor frame? no problem! we have the right adapter with the right...
Read more >EN-52055 - Engine Support Table Adapter Set
EN‑52055 is a set of adapters designed to be used with GE-52200 Propulsion System Lift Table. EN‑52055 adapters, along with additional mounting adapter...
Read more >Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start FreeTop Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
Top GitHub Comments
Thanks, will do. I guess it is not the most used feature in AF anyway 😃
@SilentLux Well, my initial idea was just to be able to access all
ISpecimenBuilder
instances we have inside the “engine”, so you can remove the existing ones or add your own ones. Speaking ofMehodQuery
(I suppose we speak about ‘these lines’), you would just add one moreMethodInvoker
with the queries you need. The scenario with “patching” (like we saw in #1017) will be solved similarly. I don’t think we should add specific API for this particular case.