Version warning when only local version is behind.
See original GitHub issueIf the global version is up to date, but the local version is behind, you still get an error message telling you to update, but it recommends using the -g
flag.
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 6 years ago
- Reactions:2
- Comments:12 (6 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
Updates were rejected because the tip of your current branch ...
*"The tip of your current branch is behind its remote counterpart"* means that there have been changes on the remote branch that you...
Read more >Fix git “tip of your current branch is behind its remote ...
Go back to the branch and “hard pull”. We'll now go back to branch branch-name and overwrite our local version with the remote...
Read more >Fix to “tip of your current branch is behind its remote counterpart”
“the tip of your current branch is behind its remote counterpart” means that there have been changes on the remote branch that you...
Read more >Chapter 29 Pull, but you have local work
29 Pull, but you have local work. Problem: You want to pull changes from upstream, but you have done some new work locally...
Read more >The local branch master is behind the remote one, therefore a ...
The local branch master is behind the remote one, therefore a new version won't be published. This comes from index.js: 68.
Read more >
Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start Free
Top Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
damn - same faith as @thisisrai 😕 just 0 time. i did ‘complete’ the actual code, but never managed to get around to test it properly or write tests.
so please do take it @tdeschryver - and if you want, i can commit my code later (missing tests as mentioned) but its a rather well outlined approach by @novemberborn above, so not sure that would help much.
@thisisrai no worries. Thanks for responding! 👍