Binding to ConverterParameter
See original GitHub issue <toolBox:ToolBoxItemView IsVisible="{Binding $parent[views:EventView].EventType,
Converter={StaticResource PopurTypeVisibleConverter},
ConverterParameter={Binding $self.Type}}"/>
I expect ConverterParameter to work like CommandParameter. But instead of the value, I get a Binding instance
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 2 years ago
- Reactions:8
- Comments:12 (8 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
Binding ConverterParameter - wpf
The ConverterParameter property can not be bound because it is not a dependency property. Since Binding is not derived from DependencyObject ...
Read more >Binding.ConverterParameter Property (System.Windows. ...
You can use the ConverterParameter property to specify how an object is converted. This property passes additional information to a converter that you...
Read more >Binding doesn't work when passed to ConverterParameter
ConverterParameter is not BindableProperty or something that is consuming a binding.Instead create a BindableProperty in the converter like in ...
Read more >Converter Parameter Binding — How to Bind Complex ...
Passing Multiple Values(can be diff types or diff ways of passing) into the Converter · And expecting them(values) inside the Converter · List...
Read more >Binding.ConverterParameter Property (Windows.UI.Xaml. ...
Most converters used for data binding simply type-convert a source object to a desired target type based solely on the characteristics of the...
Read more >Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start FreeTop Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
Top GitHub Comments
@grokys, @kekekeks
Looking at #6865, it seems like I’m not the only one who needs this function. What do you think about this?
@Mrxx99 it’s planned to have this at a certain point im time. We also have PR open for it which you can test if you want to. But I can’t give you a timing when it will be available as other things have higher priority