[s3-assets] some fields in AssetOptions are deprecated, but is that intended?
See original GitHub issueThe exclude
and follow
fields in AssetOptions interface were marked deprecated, because of #7708. But the pull doesn’t seem to have the intension to deprecate them. If not, they should be fixed.
This is a 📕 documentation issue
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 3 years ago
- Comments:11 (6 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
interface AssetOptions · AWS CDK
Python, aws_cdk.aws_s3_assets.AssetOptions. TypeScript (source), @aws-cdk/aws-s3-assets » AssetOptions ... Deprecated: see assetHash and assetHashType.
Read more >@aws-cdk/aws-s3-assets | Yarn - Package Manager
Assets are local files or directories which are needed by a CDK app. A common example is a directory which contains the handler...
Read more >awscdk - Go Packages
AWS Cloud Development Kit Library. The AWS CDK construct library provides APIs to define your CDK application and add CDK constructs to the...
Read more >How should files for AWS AssetCode be excluded now?
Nothing you need to do, looks like there is an effort to move assets classes to core. The aws-lambda package uses aws-s3-assets AssetOptions...
Read more >Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start FreeTop Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
Top GitHub Comments
Should this be re-opened? The deprecation notice remains confusing…
From user perspective, they think that they should not use
exclude
field any more because it’s marked as deprecated. But actually no plan to remove the field from AssetOptions and we don’t need to worry about using it.