MSI: move msi commands to its own command module in knack style
See original GitHub issueSo far, I put the az identity
command tree inside azure-cli-vm
command module as i want to avoid the on-going knack conversion. But after the knack release, i will do the work for the new command module. The whole thing is transparent to end users
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 6 years ago
- Reactions:3
- Comments:6 (6 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
The Complete Guide to MSI Switches for Silent Software ...
MSI Switches, the Guide msiexec.exe ' Commands to the Windows Installer service are invoked with msiexec.exe. This command can similarly be used for...
Read more >Release notes & updates – Azure CLI - Microsoft Learn
Learn about the latest Azure Command-Line Interface (CLI) release notes and updates for both the current and beta versions of the CLI.
Read more >LdT - River Thames Conditions - Environment Agency - GOV.UK
Moving out on your own budget, Bought-out items, Kosthold uten sukker mel og melk, ... love is war costume, Short havana twist styles,...
Read more >Untitled
2011 ford edge custom, Sony pm-0160-bv hard reset, Hunterdon healthcare clinton nj, ... 86 services squadron, Chicken liver fry andhra style, The end...
Read more >Package List — Spack 0.20.0.dev0 documentation
It is automatically generated based on the packages in this Spack version. ... C library for parsing GNU style command line options with...
Read more >Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start FreeTop Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
Top GitHub Comments
yes, a new command module would be too heavy and expensive. I agree we move them to
azure-cli-role
. MSI essentially is a service principal as a resource. So this makes sense.@adewaleo @yugangw-msft instead of putting them in their own module, would it make sense to put them in a module that already exists? For example
azure-cli-role
has to do with authentication, which is what MSI is. I’d prefer not to put them in a stand-alone module, but if there’s a more logical place for them to live besides the VM module that sounds good to me.