Lightrun Answers was designed to reduce the constant googling that comes with debugging 3rd party libraries. It collects links to all the places you might be looking at while hunting down a tough bug.
And, if you’re still stuck at the end, we’re happy to hop on a call to see how we can help out.
webapp: Have --html default to OS of the app service plan
See original GitHub issueIs your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
az webapp up --html defaults to a Windows OS app service plan. If a customer wants to create a static web app on a Linux OS, this command wouldn’t work.
Describe the solution you’d like
When using --html, the CLI should use the OS of the app service plan that’s being passed in. If --plan is not passed, then simply default to windows.
Describe alternatives you’ve considered
As a workaround, I added a package.json to full the CLI into creating an app which will use nodejs.
Additional context
See https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/answers/questions/37285/index.html for more details.
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 3 years ago
- Comments:7 (3 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
Top Related Medium Post
Top Related StackOverflow Question
Troubleshoot Live Code
Top Related Reddit Thread
Top Related Hackernoon Post
Top Related Tweet
Top Related Dev.to Post
Top Related Hashnode Post
@tboerstad yes static hosting on Linux is something that is in the works.
If you want to do this today, you can target one of the PHP images on linux. We include a web server that can be used for static content in those images.
@btardif Are there plans for static hosting on Linux App Service?
I face the same challenge as the original poster linked to. I have an existing backend which is running on Linux App Service, and I would like the static frontend to be in the same App Service Plan. This way the backend and frontend can share resources and hopefully improve latency. I suspect there are more of us with this use case.