Explore using parallel maven build to speed up CI builds
See original GitHub issueExplore maven option -T
that will parallelize the build and reduce the CI pipeline build time. Finding the right argument to pass to -T
might be the tricky part.
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAVEN/Parallel+builds+in+Maven+3
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 4 years ago
- Comments:5 (5 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
How to Speed up Your Maven Build - JRebel
In this article, we look at the popular Java build tool, Apache Maven, and give five tips on how to speed up Maven...
Read more >Ways to make maven build faster? - Stack Overflow
Maven 3.x has the capability to perform parallel builds. The command is as follows: mvn -T 4 clean install Builds with 4 threads;...
Read more >Parallel builds in Maven 3 - Apache Software Foundation
This build-mode analyzes your project's dependency graph and schedules modules that can be built in parallel according to the dependency graph of your...
Read more >Faster Maven builds - A Java geek
It's possible to run parallel builds using multiple threads by setting ... Maven can build them in parallel, the better you'll achieve with...
Read more >Speed Up Apache Maven Builds - Gradle Enterprise
Speed up Maven builds with a remote build cache shared by your entire team and CI; Get insights on Maven build reliability. View...
Read more >
Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start Free
Top Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
I tried this at https://github.com/Azure/azure-sdk-for-java/pull/4983, but there was no discernible difference. I may have made a mistake (please double-check @srnagar), but I think we should just close this issue.
Closing this issue based on Jonathan’s comments above.