Strange placement of [container-scan] action in actions page
See original GitHub issueHi,
I have been using this action in my project CI: here you container-scan
is called within Docker
workflow. However, I start noticing that if you go through my commit history, I start seeing container-scan
showing up under other workflows. Take this one for example, why is [container-scan]
falls under Node CI
in this case. You can also check other commits’ CI pipeline and you would not find [container-scan]
under Docker
workflow like intended. Am I doing something wrong?
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 2 years ago
- Comments:9 (2 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
Anchore Container Scan · Actions · GitHub Marketplace
This is a GitHub Action for invoking the Grype scanner and returning the vulnerabilities found, and optionally fail if a vulnerability is found...
Read more >Actions - Amazon Elastic Container Service
They are usually set in response to your actions on the site, such as setting your privacy preferences, signing in, or filling in...
Read more >Ammunition and Explosives Safety Standards
Figure 6–3: Chemical hazards symbols and actions, page 46 ... Garrison or installation ammunition and explosive location maps.
Read more >DoD Manual 5200.01, Volume 3, February 24, 2012 ...
Plans shall be developed to protect, remove, or destroy classified material in case of fire, natural disaster, civil disturbance, terrorist ...
Read more >Place an Action in a Different Location | eXpressApp Framework
Set the node's Index to 0 . Child nodes of the ActionToContainerMapping node correspond to Action Containers of your application. The Actions ......
Read more >Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start FreeTop Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
Top GitHub Comments
Hi @akphi, I have raised this issue internally and it is being discussed. The source of the issue is the tight coupling between check runs and actions service. At this point, it is not clear how this problem can be solved. I will update this issue when I get more details.
Sure thing! I don’t quite get the explanation, but I take it as a
won't-fix
for now. I will try outscanitizer
as you recommended. My question is though, currently I setup the scan in a github actions, if I installscanitizer
, do I need to remove that action or so?Also, would be great if we could have some more documentation for the app 😭