DXT internal format size missing
See original GitHub issueThanks from PixiJS team for a wonderful tool!
I’m debugging an app with big number of .dds
resources, and I found that baseRecorder
doesnt contain the size for most of compressed texture formats.
In my case its COMPRESSED_RGBA_S3TC_DXT5_EXT
.
The size is defaulting to 4
: https://github.com/BabylonJS/Spector.js/blob/1313c95a0e416ce17c7f404c3bf47a731e5a4554/src/backend/recorders/baseRecorder.ts#L200
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 4 years ago
- Comments:5 (4 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
Image Format - OpenGL Wiki - Khronos Group
An Image Format describes the way that the images in Textures and renderbuffers store their data. They define the meaning of the image's ......
Read more >DXT compression explained - FSDeveloper Wiki
You have probably noticed that the DXT compressed textures always have the same size. This is because they have a fixed compression ratio....
Read more >Textures - Bohemia Interactive Community Wiki
Each mipmap is compressed using internal compression - if the ratio between compressed and original size is less than this ratio, mipmap is ......
Read more >DXT Texture Compression in 2018 - Game Developer
If your texture isn't a multiple of four in size, the size is rounded up. Each DXT1 block compresses down to 64 bits...
Read more >Using ASTC Texture Compression for Game Assets
This is especially the case if previously you have avoided using DXT on specific assets; you might now try ASTC formats vs leaving...
Read more >Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start FreeTop Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
Top GitHub Comments
I’m on it
Btw, its not a bug. According to what I saw in the source code - its more of a feature-request.