Improve Auth Request Handler hierarchy
See original GitHub issueAuthMixin
is not a proper Mixin since it shadows methods on another base class. Move to just single inheritance as described in https://github.com/bokeh/bokeh/pull/9906#issuecomment-611855445
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 3 years ago
- Comments:10 (10 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
OAuth Scopes Best Practices | Curity
Best practices for designing OAuth scopes in real world systems and managing them at scale. Discover how to perform API Authorization using Scopes....
Read more >Design Best Practices for an Authentication System
Pushing all requests through a centralized login system to use authentication as a filter. This approach uses standard routing and ...
Read more >How can I improve the hierarchy of my event classes?
First, structure you sub-classes so they all use the same initiation parameters. Also, you could put some of the other initiating code there...
Read more >Authorization Services Guide - Keycloak
This structure represents the resources and/or scopes being requested by a client, ... Handling authorization responses from a UMA-Protected resource server.
Read more >Part 2: Handling data authorization in ASP.NET Core and ...
Example 3 (advanced): Handling hierarchical accesses that can get data for reports from a series of shops. This means that the filter rules ......
Read more >Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start FreeTop Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
Top GitHub Comments
That’s why it should go into
future
branch. As I said, I changed the base of the PR tofuture
, so it can be merged into that branch as soon as test failures are sorted out.I will look at the code bug in the PR and fix it. But, I agree with @bryevdv, this is a big change that can be merged in the next coming update as a big one.