Query streams break with `query_timeout`
See original GitHub issueBug:
If a query_timeout
is reached when using a submit
-able query object that doesn’t have a callback
method on it (such as all streaming query types, and probably most user-crafted submit
-ables), then the Client will throw a queryCallback is not a function
error. General repro would be:
const pg = require('pg')
const QueryStream = require('pg-query-stream')
const db = new pg.Client({ ..., query_timeout: 1000 })
db.connect(err => {
if (err) throw new Error('Connection error')
const qs = new QueryStream('SELECT pg_sleep(2)')
db.query(qs)
.on('data', d => console.log('data', d))
.on('end', d => console.log('end', d))
.on('error', d => (qs.close(), console.log('error', d)))
})
Analysis:
Although the node-postgres
Query
object has a callback
method for handling bulk results, other streaming objects, such as pg-cursor
and pg-query-stream
, do not have such a method. Looking at the code in client.js
, we see: https://github.com/brianc/node-postgres/blob/master/lib/client.js#L431-L457
If the Query object has a submit
method on it, and no callback
method, and if no callback is passed in as the second (values
) argument to Client#query
, then query.callback
will be undefined. Subsequently if a readTimeout
is specified (either as a query_timeout
on the Query object, or as part of the database configuration), then the read timeout assumes that query.callback
is defined and attempts to call it, resulting in a TypeError: queryCallback is not a function
.
Fix:
Since the callback
attribute appears to be an implementation detail of the node-postgres
Query
object, and the documentation for Client#query
does not indicate that this method should be present, or that a second parameter should be passed, it’s unclear whether the fix is to make callback
a required attribute on all Query
-like objects, or if it’s to fail gracefully if such a callback does not exist.
Furthermore, it’s debatable whether a query_timeout
is even appropriate on non-bulk query types (timeout to results ready? timeout until entire result set has been retrieved?), and whether that timeout code should move into the typical bulk Query
object itself, dodging the issue entirely.
Because that’s unclear, I’m leaving it to you to decide. Happy to submit a pull-request with a fix if you can tell me where/what you think the appropriate fix is.
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 5 years ago
- Reactions:19
- Comments:8 (3 by maintainers)
@brianc The issue still exists in the latest version. Could you have a look at it, please?
any update?