[Idea] Compile Python code with Brython statically

It would be nice to compile Python code with Brython statically as TypeScript did

By doing so it expand Brython also to Node.js and Deno run-times as platform for writing application instead of JavaScript

It is also cool because Node.js and Deno have JIT execution mechanism that is much faster then original Python implementation and also those run-times have Worker-s (Active Object Pattern) that allow to have real Multi-Threading execution

[lborgman]

I would suggest being able to compile Python to JavaScript with Node.js would be very nice. The translated code code should (at least in my case) be used in the web browser. (I do not know Python, but I need the functionality in some code written by others. And the code I am interested in will change quite often so I need to auto-generate the JavaScript files.)

Using Brython in the web browser will not work in my case since the number of imports is huge.

[PierreQuentel]

I have merged the PR, thanks @redradist

But I am getting dizzy with all these frameworks : only in the last 2 months there have been requests for Brython to be adapted to work with Webpack, Opal, jinja2, node.js, Deno, Travis, BeautifulSoup, Electron and Browserify…

I have nothing against these requests, but if they are included in the project, Brython users will expect that it works for months or years, support new versions of these programs, and if the author of the initial Pull Request loses interest in the mean time, I don’t want to have to maintain it myself, or explain to users that I remove the feature.

An option would be to open a Wiki page pointing to forks of Brython that work with these frameworks. Would that be ok ?