[feature]: Specify failurepolicy when MutatingWebhookConfiguration is created
See original GitHub issueIs your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
I’m trying to create a mutator on a pod, which works only while my operator is running. When the operator dies, for example, restarting the deployment, the pods can’t be created because the failurePolicy
is set to Fail
, the default. When the pod starts up after changing it manually it gets reset to Fail.
Describe the solution you would like
Have a method called on the webhook that will allow us to configure the webhook and other objects that get installed in the cluster.
Additional Context
No response
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 7 months ago
- Comments:5 (3 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
Dynamic Admission Control
failurePolicy defines how unrecognized errors and timeout errors from the admission webhook are handled. Allowed values are Ignore or Fail .
Read more >Diving into Kubernetes MutatingAdmissionWebhook
MutatingWebhookConfiguration specifies which webhook admission servers are enabled and which resources are subject to the admission server. It ...
Read more >kubernetes.admissionregistration.k8s.io.v1. ...
FailurePolicy defines how unrecognized errors from the admission endpoint are handled - allowed values are Ignore or Fail. Defaults to Fail. matchConditions ...
Read more >webhooks - OpenShift Documentation
FailurePolicy defines how unrecognized errors from the admission endpoint are handled - allowed values are Ignore or Fail. Defaults to Ignore. name. string....
Read more >mutating-webhook/README.md at master
The Admission Controller calls mutating webhooks while in the mutating phase. Mutating Webhooks can modify the incoming objects. Mutating Webhooks can do it...
Read more >Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start FreeTop Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
Top GitHub Comments
A pull request is created. It also addresses #525, something that was also causing me pains. I implemented that as an opt-in feature since it would delete the existing webhooks and recreate them on startup to guarantee an expected state.
Awesome. I’ll try and get a PR up in the next couple of days. I was thinking of a new interface that could optionally be implemented that would be called. Should be pretty easy to follow.