extraPullNames does not seem to work
See original GitHub issueI have a job that looks like this:
---
name: Build
on:
pull_request:
push:
jobs:
builds:
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
steps:
- uses: actions/checkout@v2
with:
fetch-depth: 0
- uses: cachix/install-nix-action@v12
with:
install_url: https://github.com/numtide/nix-flakes-installer/releases/download/nix-2.4pre20201221_9fab14a/install
extra_nix_config: |
experimental-features = nix-command flakes
- uses: cachix/cachix-action@v8
with:
name: terlar
authToken: '${{ secrets.CACHIX_AUTH_TOKEN }}'
extraPullNames: nix-community
- run: cat $HOME/.config/nix/nix.conf
- run: nix build --print-build-logs .#defaultPackage.x86_64-linux
The output of cachix/cachix-action@v8
:
Run cachix/cachix-action@v8
Cachix: installing
/home/runner/.nix-profile/bin/cachix authtoken ***
Written to /home/runner/.config/cachix/cachix.dhall
Cachix: using cache terlar
/nix/var/nix/profiles/per-user/runner/profile/bin/cachix use terlar
Configured https://terlar.cachix.org binary cache in /home/runner/.config/nix/nix.conf
Cachix: using extra caches nix-community
/nix/var/nix/profiles/per-user/runner/profile/bin/cachix use nix-community
Configured https://terlar.cachix.org binary cache in /home/runner/.config/nix/nix.conf
/bin/sh -c nix path-info --all | grep -v '.drv$' > /tmp/store-path-pre-build
The output of the cat:
Run cat $HOME/.config/nix/nix.conf
substituters = https://cache.nixos.org https://terlar.cachix.org
trusted-public-keys = cache.nixos.org-1:6NCHdD59X431o0gWypbMrAURkbJ16ZPMQFGspcDShjY= terlar.cachix.org-1:M8CXTOaJib7CP/jEfpNJAyrgW4qECnOUI02q7cnmh8U=
Seems it always add the cache name also for the extra caches as indicated by the output of cachix/cachix-action@v8
. I started looking into this as when I transitioned from adding the cache myself to using the extraPullNames
my build times went up a lot. Any idea what is going on?
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 3 years ago
- Comments:17 (8 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
Habitually Absent, Tardy, or Sick? How to Deal with ... - HG.org
Do you have a trouble employee that can never seem to make it to work when they are supposed to? Either they are...
Read more >Comparing c74103f105...0db0119e50 - nixos-config - Personal Forge
Turns out it doesn't work anyway if I have mu4e opened in emacs anyway, because it keeps a lockfile in place while it's...
Read more >stupidb [python]: Datasheet - Package Galaxy
Need information about stupidb? Check download stats, version history, popularity, recent code changes and more.
Read more >
Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start Free
Top Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
Okay, thank you for the clarification, that makes sense. I guess those examples I saw was configured before this feature. Then I will stick to the recommendations and await your changes. In the meantime there is also the work-around to populate the nix configuration with other caches “manually”.
Funnily enough if you recommended to use signing key my next question would be about how I rotate/revoke them 😸
Thank you for cachix, apart from this it has been smooth sailing.
That is correct. The problem is that cache token is tied to a specific cache, but really requesting another cache should just work.
That is if you want to manage signing yourself, which I don’t recommend as per https://blog.cachix.org/posts/2020-11-09-write-access-control-for-binary-caches/