Lightrun Answers was designed to reduce the constant googling that comes with debugging 3rd party libraries. It collects links to all the places you might be looking at while hunting down a tough bug.
And, if you’re still stuck at the end, we’re happy to hop on a call to see how we can help out.
Missing branch coverage for DFA.random_word()
See original GitHub issue@Tagl I am getting pretty close to releasing v7 (hooray!). However, I noticed that there was a slight drop in code coverage with the introduction of DFA.random_word(). Since you implemented that method, I wanted to ask for your help in covering that additional case.
From what I can tell, the outer loop never runs for more than one iteration (either that, or it never completes without a break). In your tests, you seem to be testing high-enough values of k, so I suspect the real gap may be not testing random_word() with a partial DFA (i.e. allow_partial=True). But I could certainly be wrong. 😅
I would appreciate any help you can offer. Screenshots are provided below.
HTML coverage report (locally):
Coveralls Report (link)
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 10 months ago
- Comments:7 (7 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
Top Related Medium Post
Top Related StackOverflow Question
Troubleshoot Live Code
Top Related Reddit Thread
Top Related Hackernoon Post
Top Related Tweet
Top Related Dev.to Post
Top Related Hashnode Post
@Tagl That totally makes sense. And it wouldn’t be the first time there’s been an unreachable branch in the codebase (i.e. search for
# pragma: no branch😅).In that case, it should be safe to ignore the coverage by adding a
# pragma: no branch, meaning I can move forward with publishing v7 today! 🎉Closing this issue since I resolved it shortly before releasing v7 recently. 😃