async.map, but with an index like async.eachOf
See original GitHub issueHey all
Looking through the docs, I am looking for async.map
, but with the index of the iteratee passed to the callback.
With async.each
, the analogue is async.eachOf
. But I don’t see async.mapOf
or what not.
Is there such a thing? Let me know if you need more info, thanks!
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 7 years ago
- Comments:8 (3 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
async - Documentation - GitHub Pages
An async function to apply to each item in coll . The array index is not passed to the iteratee. If you need...
Read more >Building async and concurrent versions of forEach and map
Let's take a look at how we can utilize Swift's built-in concurrency system when performing data transformations using functions like ...
Read more >async.js each get index in iterator - javascript - Stack Overflow
You can use async.forEachOf - it calls its iterator callback with the index as its second argument. > async.forEachOf(['a', 'b', 'c'], ...
Read more >How to Use Async/await With .map in JavaScript
In this short guide, you will see what the most common errors are and how to solve them. For this we will have...
Read more >How to use async functions with Array.map in Javascript
floor(i / n) where i is the index of the element will do. As an example, a group of size 3 will map...
Read more >
Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start Free
Top Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
We’re ok 👍 Anyway here’s what i tried to get the data back:
~
forEachOf
and family don’t pass the results to the callback. If you want the key, you could do something like:~~Keep in mind, this will return an array, and the order will not be guaranteed. You’d have to build a result object manually.~
EDIT: use
mapValues