Stuck on an issue?
Lightrun Answers was designed to reduce the constant googling that comes with debugging 3rd party libraries. It collects links to all the places you might be looking at while hunting down a tough bug.
And, if you’re still stuck at the end, we’re happy to hop on a call to see how we can help out.
`tagName` can be null
See original GitHub issuetagName can be null, we need to modify the logic on Element.ts since it is causing problems to test web components using lit on vitest repo
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 2 years ago
- Comments:6 (6 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
TypeError: Cannot read property 'tagName' of null?
I am trying to remove css file from head tag dynamically .I am getting this error. TypeError: Cannot read ...
Read more >Cannot read property 'tagName' of null #12830 - vercel/next.js
When I remove this Head tag, this error is gone, but I need it to inject new relic script. Can anyone help please...
Read more >[Multilingual Component] Cannot read property 'tagName' of null
When I try to load resource from file I get the error. Cannot read property 'tagName' of null. The json file is a...
Read more >When should I use a "null" or empty alt tag? - Accessible Web
Answer. Alt tags are used to describe the contents of images, but some images don't convey any meaning and are therefore considered "decorative."...
Read more >HTML Elements - W3Schools
HTML elements with no content are called empty elements. The <br> tag defines a line break, and is an empty element without a...
Read more >
Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start Free
Top Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
No problem! Thats because I wrote “not” by mistake, but I corrected it 😅
@userquin great! Just to clarify, the fix is released 🙂