Only running each pairing once could result in too much randomness affecting results
See original GitHub issueThe current prisonersDilemma.py
script only pits each algorithm against each other once, meaning that randomness (both in the algorithms themselves and in the round length) could significantly affect the results. A fix for this would be to run each round many times over.
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 2 years ago
- Reactions:7
- Comments:15 (1 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
Why Do I Get Different Results Each Time in Machine Learning?
Stochastic machine learning algorithms use randomness during learning, ensuring a different model is trained each run.
Read more >How to Do Random Allocation (Randomization) - PMC - NCBI
This allows researchers to control all known and unknown factors that may affect results in treatment groups and control groups.
Read more >Chapter 14 – From Randomness to Probability
If a roulette wheel is to be considered truly random, then each outcome is equally likely to occur, and knowing one outcome will...
Read more >Random intercept models | Centre for Multilevel Modelling
So we'd actually like to control for the previous exam score so that we can try ... So far we've looked at examples...
Read more >Randomness and Game Design - Keith Burgun
Output randomness does not increase the depth of a game. How could it? There is nothing to explore in a dice-roll. We all...
Read more >
Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start Free
Top Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
That’s right, I modified the runFullPairingTournament function for those who are interested in this kind of technique.
I’ve been using a modified version of that function myself for testing, but this one looks much cleaner. Thanks!