Request: change EPA CEMS variable descriptions
See original GitHub issueBelow I’ve listed the current variable descriptions for each of the EPA CEMS variables, as well as my proposed change. I think these changes are helpful because they’re sometimes more correct (e.g. plant_id_eia
vs facility_id
) or are more precise about units.
For some variables, particularly steam_load_1000_lbs
, facility_id
, and unit_id_epa
, I’m a little unsure what to write.
CC: @cmgosnell and @gschivley
id
- Current: PUDL-issued surrogate key.
- Proposed: Unique PUDL-issued plant-unit-hour key (may change between PUDL versions).
state
- Current: State the plant is located in.
- Proposed: no change
plant_id_eia
- Current: EIA Plant Identification number. One to five digit numeric.
- Proposed: The unique six-digit facility identification number, also called an ORISPL, assigned by the Energy Information Administration.
unitid
- Current: Facility-specific unit id (e.g. Unit 4)
- Proposed: no change
operating_datetime_utc
- Current: Date and time measurement began.
- Proposed: Date and time measurement began (UTC).
operating_time_hours
- Current: Length of time interval measured.
- Proposed: no change
gross_load_mw
- Current: Power delivered during time interval measured.
- Proposed: Average power in megawatts delivered during time interval measured.
steam_load_1000_lbs
- Current: Total steam pressure produced by a unit or source in any calendar year (or other specified time period) produced by combusting a given heat input of fuel.
- Proposed: Not sure, but should be specific to the hour, not the year
so2_mass_lbs
- Current: Sulfur dioxide emissions in pounds.
- Proposed: no change
so2_mass_measurement_code
- Current: Identifies whether the reported value of emissions was measured, calculated, or measured and substitute.
- Proposed: no change
nox_rate_lbs_mmbtu
- Current: The rate at which NOx in was emitted in pounds per million BTU.
- Proposed: no change
nox_rate_measurement_code
- Current: Identifies whether the reported value of emissions was measured, calculated, or measured and substitute.
- Proposed: no change
nox_mass_lbs
- Current: Nitrogen oxide emissions in pounds.
- Proposed: NOx emissions in pounds.
nox_mass_measurement_code
- Current: Identifies whether the reported value of emissions was measured, calculated, or measured and substitute.
- Proposed: no change
co2_mass_tons
- Current: Carbon dioxide emissions in short tons.
- Proposed: no change
co2_mass_measurement_code
- Current: Identifies whether the reported value of emissions was measured, calculated, or measured and substitute.
- Proposed: no change
heat_content_mmbtu
- Current: The measure of utilization that is calculated by multiplying the quantity of fuel by the fuel’s heat content.
- Proposed: The energy contained in fuel burned, measured in million BTU.
facility_id
- Current: The unique six-digit facility identification number, also called an ORISPL, assigned by the Energy Information Administration.
- Proposed: New EPA plant ID.
unit_id_epa
- Current: Unique EPA identifier for each unit at a facility.
- Proposed: New EPA unit ID.
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 4 years ago
- Comments:8 (8 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
EMC: Continuous Emission Monitoring Systems | US EPA
A continuous emission monitoring system (CEMS) is the total equipment necessary for the determination of a gas or particulate matter ...
Read more >Continuous Emission Monitoring System Subset : User's Guide
1. Prepare the Data . Fill out the appropriate coding. · 2. Run the Edit Proqran . · 3. Examine Edit Report ....
Read more >Plain English Guide to the Part 75 Rule
Does Part 75 require periodic quality QA/QC testing after a monitoring ... The specific components of a CEMS depend upon the parameter being...
Read more >Part 75 Emissions Monitoring Policy Manual
The EPA initially promulgated regulations for Acid Rain Program continuous emission monitoring (CEM) requirements at 40 CFR Part 75 on January ...
Read more >An Operator's Guide To Eliminating Bias in CEM Systems - EPA
It consists of two major components: A pull-out chart, entitled Eliminating Bias in CEMS — A Checklist, provides a comprehensive listing of the...
Read more >Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start FreeTop Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
Top GitHub Comments
From the plain english guide to Part 75.. F-factors are provided in Appendix F of Part 75.
hey @karldw ! Lots of these changes look great to me. I’m also unsure about those three fields, but for implementation you can to add these directly into the models for now on the master branch. I’m able to regenerate the metadata for the data packaging based on the current state of the database and I’ll probably keep that functionality until the actual switch over date… which is probably still two weeks out. Until then, you can change the comments in models and after that you’ll be able to modify the metadata in
pudl/src/pudl/package_data/meta/data_package/datapackge.json
.