Replace pebble with standard library modules
See original GitHub issueCurrently we require pebble
because multiprocessing.Pool
did not work with the workaround introduced for Anaconda on macOS (#119). In theory, it should be possible to make do without pebble
, because this package is just a wrapper for some standard library modules.
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 4 years ago
- Comments:11 (11 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
Pebble — Pebble 5.0.3 documentation
Pebble aims to help managing threads and processes in an easier way. It wraps Python's standard library threading and multiprocessing objects.
Read more >pebble - Go Packages
Take control of your internal daemons! Pebble helps you to orchestrate a set of local service processes as an organized set. It resembles...
Read more >Pebble.js
Pebble.js provides the Feature module so that you may perform feature detection. This allows you to change the presentation or behavior of your...
Read more >PEP 594 – Removing dead batteries from the standard library
This PEP proposed a list of standard library modules to be removed from the standard library. The modules are mostly historic data formats...
Read more >proposal: cmd/go: allow replace directives in go.mod to work ...
This is in general not possible. The standard library is not a collection of individual modules. It is more like a single module....
Read more >Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start FreeTop Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
Top GitHub Comments
Yes to both.
Well yes, but IMO this is not the main question now that we know that it works. Maybe
pebble
does something clever to always start the originalpython
process. I think I’ll open an issue to let Anaconda know that the versions need to be the same.