Liquid createOrder response cost properties undefined
See original GitHub issueCCXT version: 1.38.28
When calling createOrder
type market, the cost properties in the response is undefined
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 3 years ago
- Reactions:1
- Comments:8 (8 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
Order - Shopify.dev
An order is a customer's request to purchase one or more products from a shop. You can create, retrieve, update, and delete orders...
Read more >php - Issue in accessing object property in javascript shows ...
I am just calling api which returns josn encoded data and trying to print object property but shows undefined but when I print...
Read more >Game.map.isRoomAvailable - Screeps Documentation
This property is not defined when full CPU is not unlocked for your account ... All Game.map.visual calls have no added CPU cost...
Read more >Setting Up Application-Specific Installation Options
Use the Installation Options component (INSTALLATION) to set up application-specific installation options for PeopleSoft applications. Expand all sections ...
Read more >Mapping Fluid Flow in Porous Biomaterials for Tissue Engineering
cellular response to fluid flow in culture, in addition to how far these two influence ... This technique utilises the spin properties of...
Read more >
Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start Free
Top Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
Yes, I agree with your point. Let’s close the issue then, thx for your help @kroitor
@kroitor So I received an answer from the Liquid team: “Please try to fetch the order after getting a successful create order, which shows the order as filled.” Do you think it makes sense to implement this way?