Proposal: custom constructors handling

I think it’s a good idea to implement custom constructor support (and analysis). For example, I want the following behavior to work as expected:

    [InitRequired]
    public class Address
    {
        // Default constructor should NOT report CS8618 (since we are using InitRequired).
        public Address() { }

        // This constructor SHOULD report CS8618 (since it doesn't set all non-nullable fields).
        // Even though we have InitRequired attribute set.
        public Address(string city)
        {
            City = city;
        }

        // This constructor should NOT report CS8618 (since it initializes the object in a valid state).
        public Address(string city, bool hasStreet)
        {
            City = city;
            Street = hasStreet ? "Default avenue" : "Unknown";
        }

        public string City { get; set; }
        public string Street { get; set; }
        public string? SecondAddress { get; set; }
    }

    static class Program
    {
        static void Main()
        {
            // CSE001: Missing initialization of all 3 fields.
            var message = new Address();

            // CSE001: Missing initialization of 2 fields.
            var message2 = new Address
            {
                City = "city"
            };

            // Constructor should handle object being properly initialized.
            // Allow custom constuctors here, do NOT report CSE001.
            var message3 = new Address("city");
        }
    }

[Lonli-Lokli]

@cezarypiatek Thank you, it works!

[cezarypiatek]

It looks like this one has matching constructor argument names to property names. I can make a code fix that will try to rewrite it into init block.